News Alert
At Least One Reportedly Injured In Woodbridge…

Woodbridge Residents Thrilled Nativity Scene is on Display

Facebook users are, on the whole, overjoyed that the Nativity scene is up this year on township property.

The Nativity scene, a staple of holiday decorating in Woodbridge, was late arriving on town hall property this year.

 Letters written by the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) to Mayor John McCormac last year objected to the display. FFRF is an atheist activist group from Wisconsin that operates nationwide on situations they view as being unconstitutional - such as erecting Nativity scenes on public property.

A nativity by itself on town hall property is "an unconstitutional endorsement of religion," said Patrick Elliott, an FFRF attorney. 

When the story that the Nativity was missing was posted on Woodbridge Patch's Facebook page early Monday morning, it drew a lot of comments.

"One person complained and we cave..........very sad, but more frightening that we keep allowing this to happen," said Elizabeth Ann Vitale.

Stephen Mckessy was disgusted. "It is Christmas, we should have the scene up; also, put whatever religious scenes up that need be up. These people make me sick."

Linda Grohowski said she was "disappointed that Woodbridge gave in" by not putting up the manager display.

One Patch reader, Kathy Hollus-Lis, posted before 10:30 in the morning both town hall and McCormac's office number for people to make their feelings known.

By 4 pm on Monday, Public Works employees were erecting the Nativity scene in the rain. They also put up Santa Claus, a Christmas tree, a few reindeer, and a 'Happy Kwanzaa' sign.

After looking at Patch pictures of the reconfigured holiday display, Elliott was not impressed. "The initial response - not putting up the Nativity - was the correct response," said Elliott. "What they did now was put up a lot of stuff, and that's just a scheme. It seems they put it up because of complaints.

"It's not a matter of the majority, saying, we like it here. it's a matter of following the First Amendment," he said. "It also has to be viewed in an individual context."

By Tuesday, when Patch ran a second article on the now-erected display, Woodbridge residents on Facebook were, on the whole, delighted.

"Way to go, Woodbridge!" exclaimed both Diane Gacina Plutino and Carrie Christian D'Amato, while Janet Coppola said, "Great news!"

But not everyone was thrilled. "I personally don't care either way but why do you need your government to validate your religion?" Melanie Armenia posted.

Follow Woodbridge Patch on FacebookTwitter and sign up for the daily newsletter.

Sven Hartley December 14, 2012 at 07:23 PM
Supreme Court ruled against public nativities in 1989. If the mayor is that ignorant of the law, perhaps it is time to step down. The mayor should be setting an example, not violating the law.
Tom Maras December 14, 2012 at 08:44 PM
@Sven Hartley. If Ignorance is bliss, you must be one happy person! Fast forward a few years from 1989 to :http://www.mrsc.org/artdocmisc/display.pdf In most cases, ignorance isn't a permanent condition. It can be treated with a dose of knowledge. Good luck with your! This is one issue on which I fully support the mayor/council, even if they have to give the township lawyers a Christmas bonus! Tis' the season, do enjoy it.
Elmer Bigelow December 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM
You must be an atheist.
Elmer Bigelow December 20, 2012 at 12:29 AM
You must be an atheist.
Elmer Bigelow December 20, 2012 at 12:37 AM
Let's turn back time and enjoy whatever life we had in this world before the post stupids were born..


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »