Beware: Red Light Cameras are Live at New Intersections

You didn't know the 30 day grace period started on Christmas Day for two of the three new intersections, but it did. Tickets with $140 fines commence on January 24.

The clock has started ticking on the , and at two of the intersections, the 30-day grace period is almost up.

Starting January 24, if you run a red light at two of the new intersections flanked by cameras that snap photos of license plates for going through a red light, you'll get hit with a $140 fine.

The NJ Dept. of Transportation had given the township the go-ahead to start up the cameras on December 25 for two of the three new intersections: Route 1 and Green Street, and Route 184/West Pond Road, at the entrance to Walmart.

Approval for the third intersection with red light cameras, at Route 1 and Gill Lane, was given by the DOT on January 16. The grace period at that intersection ends on February 15.

The way the system works is that for first 30 days after the cameras become operational, drivers who get snagged will only get a warning notice in the mail, not a ticket.

But after the 30 days are up, the tickets and the $140 fines that come with them, are for real. Motorists who get the tickets will not get any points on their licenses as they would if they were stopped by a police officer for running a red light.

The three new red light camera intersections join an already existing red light camera which was installed in July, 2010 at Avenel Street and Route 1.

"The problem I have with them is that the yellow light doesn't give people enough time to get through an intersection," said Councilman Bob Luban, who voted to approve the cameras.

Luban also said that the signs warning people about the lights should be more prominent. "The signs should be larger so drivers know they're there and change their behavior," he said. "They're so small that you can get into an accident, trying to find them in all the visual clutter on the side of the road."

The official reason for having the red light cameras is to promote safety, but there's no question the red light cameras are big moneymakers for towns that have them. 

The red light camera at Avenel Street and Route 1 brought in $1,240,526, with the township getting $632,837 of that, according to a report at newjerseynewsroom.com.

Tom Maras January 20, 2012 at 01:42 PM
Another way to feed the MAC machine. Towns are making money the old fashion way, they are stealing it. But unlike Jessie James, they are using cameras to steal it. There are a lot of hype videos (from the camera *manufacturers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1t7h_HzfcYI) showing cars running red lights, but try finding one showing how the lights with cameras are stopping accidents. (*) The organization that did the video is the National Coalition for Safer Roads (NCSR). NCSR is supported by American Traffic Solutions, the company that sells the cameras. How self-promoting!
Jim January 20, 2012 at 06:57 PM
Cameras give a false sense of safety, because even with a $500 fine (Calif.) they can't stop the real late running that occurs when someone is lost, distracted, confused or impaired. The presence of a camera can't stop the real late runners because the runners don't know (a tourist), or don't remember, that there's a camera up ahead. They're not doing it on purpose! To stop them, improve the visual cues that say "Intersection ahead." Florida's DOT found that pavement markings (paint!) cut running by up to 74%. Make the signals brighter, bigger, add backboards, and put the poles on the NEAR side of the intersection. Put brighter bulbs in the street lights at signals, and lighted name signs for the cross streets. Who needs cameras? But even with cameras, do the visual cues. They are cheap to do so can be done citywide, unlike cameras which are expensive, increase rearenders, drive shoppers/tourists away, and send local money to Oz or AZ where it won't come back.
Rick March 29, 2012 at 06:54 PM
Absurd. Besides the fact that this is just a revenue generator, it's not safe. How many rear-enders and associated neck injuries as folks slam on the brakes to avoid a fine?
Joe April 27, 2012 at 04:54 PM
Just a money making scheme, having no impact on road safety. If they must be there, there should be lighted warning signs well ahead of the the traffic signal. Joe


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something